Clojure Language Specification — Front Matter
Edition: Draft 1 · Describes: Clojure 1.12 (reference) · Status: in progress
This document specifies the Clojure programming language independently of any implementation. See docs/rfc/0001-language-specification.md for motivation, process, and scope.
1. Conformance terminology
The key words MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, and MAY are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
- A statement marked MUST is normative: a conforming implementation exhibits exactly this behavior, and the conformance suite tests it.
- implementation-defined marks behavior a conforming implementation must document but may choose (e.g. the concrete error type thrown where the reference throws a JVM exception class).
- host-defined marks behavior delegated to the host platform (e.g. what
slurpaccepts as a source). - ⚠ reference-divergence marks a place where this spec deliberately differs from observed reference behavior, with rationale; the reference behavior is always recorded alongside.
2. Classification of the core surface
Every clojure.core var carries exactly one classification (dashboard: coverage.md):
| Class | Meaning | Spec treatment |
|---|---|---|
| portable | semantics independent of host | full normative entry (§9) |
| host-dependent | portable interface, host-defined behavior | interface entry; behavior host-defined |
| JVM-specific | meaningful only on the JVM | catalogued in Appendix; not specified |
Initial classifications are mechanical and reviewable; reclassification is an ordinary spec change.
3. The normative entry format
Each special form (§3) and portable var (§9) is specified as:
### name — since <version>
(signature ...) (signature ...)
Semantics
S1. <numbered normative statement, MUST/SHOULD/MAY>
S2. ...
Edge cases
E1. <nil / empty / bounds / wrong-type behavior — normative>
Errors
X1. <what MUST throw; error TYPE is implementation-defined unless stated>
Examples
<executable; verified against the reference; sourced from ClojureDocs
where community-validated>
Conformance
S1 → <suite>/<test id>; E1 → ... (statements without a test: UNVERIFIED)
The Conformance field is load-bearing: every numbered statement names the test(s) that verify it. A normative statement with no test is labeled UNVERIFIED and is a defect in the spec.
4. Evidence and verification
Behavioral questions are settled in this order: differential testing against the reference implementation → cross-dialect agreement in clojure-test-suite → ClojureDocs community examples (verified before inclusion) → reference source (for intent). Conformance tests live in this repository (the corpus test/chez/corpus.edn, run on Chez via host/chez/run-corpus.ss and certified against reference JVM Clojure by test/conformance/certify.clj) and in the cross-dialect clojure-test-suite.
5. Chapter plan
| § | File | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01-evaluation.md | planned |
| 2 | 02-reader.md | drafted (grammar + reader-macro catalog; 2 divergences open) |
| 3 | 03-special-forms.md | exemplars written (if, let*); catalog complete |
| 4 | 04-data-types.md | planned (numeric-tower design note required) |
| 5 | 05-sequences.md | planned (laziness contract) |
| 6 | 06-namespaces-vars.md | planned |
| 7 | 07-polymorphism.md | planned |
| 8 | 08-macros.md | planned |
| 9 | 09-core-library.md | exemplars written (first, reduce, parse-uuid) |
| A | coverage.md | generated (regenerate: python3 tools/spec_coverage.py) |